CIPD has conducted the annual survey of Learning and Development professionals. And the survey highlights the latest trends. It also identifies the challenges and understand how things are changing in Learning and Development.
In January 2015, the survey went out, and 541 L&D professionals responded. And to save you time, we have been ‘Summarising the CIPD Annual Survey Report 2015’:
Summarising the CIPD Annual Survey Report 2015
The role and purpose of the learning and development function
- In more than 40% of organisations, L&D is a specialist role within HR. Meanwhile, for 20% L&D is part of general HR duties. And for just under 40% activities are split between HR and another area of the business.
- Also, L&D is ‘extremely aligned’ with business strategy for 25% of organisations. And in 40% of organisations ‘broadly aligned’. Meanwhile, 6% report ‘not aligned’. And the main barriers to alignment are a lack of clarity by L&D and a lack of interest by business leaders to involve L&D.
Trends in learning and development
- In-house methods remain the most common. And the most popular development methods are on-the-job training, in-house development programmes and coaching by line managers/peers. And L&D professionals expect these methods to grow.
- Meanwhile, learning technologies, such as E-learning and blended learning, are more common in large organisations, and they are going to grow.
- Meanwhile, 75% of organisations currently offer coaching and mentoring, and an additional 13% plan to introduce this within 12 months. And most expect to increase their use of coaching.
- Interestingly, L&D content is developed from scratch on 50% of occasions, while 40% is adapted, and 10% is user-generated.
- It turns out, approximately 66% of organisations offer training to non-employee groups, such as students, clients, or volunteers.
- L&D professionals anticipate a closer integration of L&D activity with business strategy and more emphasis on monitoring & evaluation.
Sustainable learning is available with our unique training method – ‘Sticky Learning ®‘.
- 75% of organisations use learning technologies. And the extent of their use varies widely, and face-to-face remains dominant.
- Meanwhile, only 25% of L&D professionals feel extremely and very confident using learning technologies to increase the effectiveness of their L&D interventions.
- Most L&D professionals plan to conduct leadership development activities within the next 12 months, with the key areas being to equip line managers to improve staff performance, change and enhance the organisational culture and improve the skills of existing leaders to think more strategically.
- People management practices effectively support leadership, yet improvement is necessary for reward and recognition.
- 60% of organisations have talent management activities, with large organisations more likely to do so.
- The most common activities have remained the same. And these are high-potential in-house development schemes, coaching, mentoring, and buddying schemes, plus these are the most effective.
The development of L&D professionals
- Over 20% feel that there is little or no encouragement or enabling of L&D capability.
- Meanwhile, 25% integrate findings from social/behavioural neuroscience into practice, 20% integrate cognitive psychology, and 10% findings from behavioural economics.
Assessing the impact of learning and development activity
- 14% do not evaluate the majority of their L&D activities, over 33% limit their evaluations to the learners’ satisfaction, and 20% assess the transfer of learning into the workplace. Meanwhile, a small minority evaluates the impact on the organisation.
- Learner & manager reflection & feedback are most common in assessing the learning. And other metrics are more likely to work when the L&D and the business strategy align.
- Meanwhile, 30% quantify the impact of L&D on productivity using a range of metrics from sales, profit, performance, savings, etc., as well as behavioural and cultural.
- They use the evaluations to review the delivery method and update the L&D intervention. And over 50% share the results internally, and only 20% share the results externally.
- The most common barrier to evaluation is ‘other business priorities’, as well as quality of data collected, L&D capability to conduct the evaluation and ‘other L&D priorities’.
Economic situation and training spend
- Changes to L&D resources are related to the performance of the organisation with over 50% of the public sector L&D professionals reporting a decrease in their budget, whilst in the private sector, 25% have had their budget increased, and 25% have had their budget decreased.
- Indeed, the private sector is twice as likely to increase their L&D headcount and more likely to increase their use of external associates. Meanwhile, for the public sector, the picture is the opposite.
- Meanwhile, 33% of organisations have increased their spend on learning technologies.
- The future of funding for L&D is mixed with over 25% of private organisations anticipate spending more in the next 12 months. And 15% expect spending less, and 50% of the public sector expect a decrease in spending.
About the CIPD
Reading the report, what do you think is CIPD’s most valuable insight? Please share your view by commenting below.